How to get a warm intro to VC without a network? (The ranking system most founders don't know exists.)
Half the top 300 VC firms score your network in real time - before a partner ever replies. Here's how the ranking works, and how to build one from scratch.
👋 Hey, Sahil here - welcome to today’s edition of Venture Curator, where we break down how great startups grow, how top investors think, and what’s shaping the future of tech.
P.S. Get access to 100+ startup & VC resources, investor databases, fundraising templates, 150+ premium archive posts and exclusive startup research - all in one place.
FROM OUR PARTNER - FRAMER
Launch your site faster than ever with Framer - now with Agents that make every part of your workflow effortless…
Framer is the pro website builder for creators, teams, and businesses that care enough to get every detail right.
Now with Agents that work alongside you across the full website workflow: designing new pages, managing your CMS, editing content, and adding SEO all without leaving the tool where the real site lives. Trusted by teams at companies like Miro and Perplexity
Agents bring speed and scale; you bring taste, judgment, and control. Together you can:
Build and iterate faster: generate sections, refine layout and styling, and ship updates in minutes.
Scale content with confidence: update CMS collections, localise copy, and keep metadata consistent across pages.
Stay production‑ready: reviewable changes, collaboration, and safeguards that help teams ship without handoffs.
Launch your site with Framer today →
WORK WITH US
🤝 Partnership With Us
Get your product in front of over 125,000+ audience - Our newsletter is read by thousands of tech professionals, founders, investors and managers worldwide. Get in touch today.
📜 DEEP DIVE
How to get a warm intro to a VC without a network? (The ranking system most founders don't know exists.)
Most founders think a warm intro is a favour. Someone who likes you nudges a busy person to take a look. That’s the whole model in their head: informal, personal, a little bit of luck.
That’s not how the other side of the table works anymore -
Warmth used to be a judgment call - a partner trying to remember who might know you, weighing a favour by gut feel. That model is quietly gone.
It’s been replaced by something closer to a live score: every real interaction a fund has with its network - an email, a call, a calendar invite - gets tracked and turned into a measurable connection strength between each person at that firm and everyone in their extended world. When your name comes up, nobody has to rack their brain for who might know you. The strongest, most recent path is already sitting there, ranked.
This isn’t a niche habit at a handful of firms chasing new software. Roughly half of the top 300 VC firms globally now run tools built specifically to do this at scale - and the funds that don’t still do a rougher version of it by hand, through deal trackers and partner notes that log the same underlying thing: who talked to this founder, how recently, and through what channel.
The tool changes from firm to firm. The logic underneath it doesn’t. Intros are being scored now, formally or informally, whether or not a founder ever sees it happen.
This matters more than it sounds like it should, because of what it changes underneath. A warm intro isn’t evaluated as “did someone vouch for this person.” It’s evaluated against a live map the firm already has of its own network, and firms running this formally report closing deals roughly 25% faster off the back of it. Which means the real question isn’t “who can I get to introduce me.” It’s “who already shows up as a strong, recent connection to this fund” - and those aren’t always the same person.
Here’s the part most founders miss: the score isn’t how well someone knows you - it’s activity. How often, how recently, through what channel. A portfolio founder gone quiet for eight months can score weaker than a co-investor who called last week. An old college friend at the fund shows up instantly, years out of touch, because only the fund-side contact gets measured.
It’s not a trust map. It’s an activity map and that changes who you ask, and when.
So why doesn’t this change how founders approach it? Two reasons.
They don’t know the hierarchy exists.
Every “sure, happy to intro you” feels like the same win, so they treat it that way - and burn their one real relationship, the portfolio founder who actually knows their work, on a fund that was never a great fit. By the time the right fund comes along, that favour’s already spent.
They don’t know how to ask.
A vague “would love an intro if you’re open to it!” forces the connector to write the pitch themselves - figure out what to say, why it matters, how to frame it. Most people, even ones who genuinely like you, will let that sit in their drafts rather than do the work. The ask itself is usually the thing that kills it, not the relationship.
Today’s deep dive covers:
How do you build real investor relationships months before you need them?
Which type of “warm” actually moves a VC and which just feels like it does?
Why does your best relationship keep landing at the wrong fund?
What do you actually say to a portfolio founder, a co-investor, an advisor, or a scout?
What’s the one rule message that keeps an intro from quietly backfiring?
What do you send the second someone says yes?
Which mistake kills a warm intro before it ever reaches the partner?